Alternative energy sources up in the sky

Considering the danger represented by the climateby-products. This gas could also be used for
changes and the global warming phenomena scientistspowering spacecrafts.Commercially unfeasibleMan on
and businessmen worldwide started to look forMoonThe US goverment and some European
alternative energy sources. Besides the wind powercountries as well have studied the energy potential of
or the nuclear energy is has been recently taken intothe Moon. And yet it is highly unlikely that any
consideration a new power generating substance:government or group of states will spend the money
helium 3.What exactly is helium 3? Helium 3, annecessary to go to the Moon and establish a base on
isotope of helium, a gas used to inflate balloons, hasit to support scientific research or the construction of
a nucleus with two protons and one neutron. Thethe first production facilities. Hopefully the next few
solar wind, the rapid stream of charged particlesyears will witness a media campaign to support the
emitted by the Sun, strikes the planets and theirenterprise in the context of the global warming and
sattelites in the solar system and thus helium 3 isthe lack of terrestrial resources. Human society is
deposited in the superficial soil (also called regolith). Asstraining to keep pace with its ever increasing energy
the Moons atmosphere is not very dense this flowdemands which are expected to increase eightfold by
of particles easily penetrates the gas layer and2050 as the population swells toward 12 billion. The
reaches the ground. Over millions and billions of yearsmoon and its resources just may be the answer.At
that adds up. But for its denser protective gasesthe moment the most important aspect that prevent
layers the Earth would have been under the directthe exploitation of the lunar resources is the money.
action of the Sun too thus being contaminated byThe long term investors have to consider spending a
toxic products.Louie Alvarez and Robert Cornoglot of it for 10 to 15 tears before any adequate
discovered helium 3 in 1939 but it was only 1957return of investment. Companies in the field of
when it drew the attention of researchers. It hasenergy production are reluctant to consider investing
been estimated that only a few hundreds poundsin such an enterprise. The other element that
exist on Earth, most the by-product ofencourages skepticism is the lack of appropriate
nuclear-weapon production. Experts estimate thattechnologies. The fact is that once applied for
there are about 1 million tons of helium 3 on theeconomical purposes not only in labs and used on
Moon, enough to provide the world with power forlarge scale these technologies become very
thousands of years from now on. The equivalent ofexpensive. Both proponents and skeptics have to
a single space shuttle load (25 tons) could supply theconsider that for example to produce 70 tons of
entire United States energy needs for a year,helium 3 one million tons of lunar soil would need to
according to Apollo 17 astronaut and Harrisonbe heated to 800 C to liberate the gas.If successful
Schmitt.The advocates of this energy source supportthe researchers efforts to find new alternative
the idea of building reactors based on the reaction ofresources on the Moon could pay off the interested
deuterium and helium 3 even in the middle of a biginvestors but as we said before nobody is prepared
city. It is said that the fusion reaction using this gas isto invest money in soap balloons and the Moon in the
very efficient and it releases very little radioactivesky.