Ban Or Save the Plastic Bag?

As part of the conservation and environmentalpresented. And this is quite understandable, after all
movement worldwide there are several campaignstheir industry could be hit very badly. (This just
aimed at banning the plastic bag. These fit inreminds me that all businesses have a life time curve
perfectly with going green at home and with ourthat goes from birth, to growth, to maturity and
longer term life styles.finally to demise. The time scale can be as short as a
A quick search on the web will take you to the Sanyear to as long as a hundred years or more, but the
Francisco Bay Area, "Bay vs Bag", to the Daily Mail'send result is that it is replaced by something else).
(UK) "Banish the Bags" as well as similar situations inSome of the arguments are saying that nets and not
Canada, Holland, China, elsewhere in the US and evenplastic bags are causing marine life casualties, that
Zanzibar.paper bags are a worse alternative (side stepping the
A lot of the focus is based on the damage done toplastic bag issue) and basically attacking the "plastic
wild life, including sea mammals and birds; the effectsbag misinformation campaign".
on waste and the average number of bags used perVery probably both sides are looking to make their
person in different countries. In one of the lists Ipoints by reducing or ridiculing their opponents point
saw, Singapore was topping the list at 625 bags.of view. But the overall issue is still there - are plastic
One of the targets is to reduce by 10% the yearlybags affecting our environment?
consumption of these bags.To get back to the plastic bag banning situation,
On the other hand there are also "Save the Plasticwhere paper bags have the negative effect of more
Bag" campaigns, with the plastic industry behind it.trees cut, the information that is being retrieved is
Their main focus is highlighting what they callvery important. But it must also be as objective as
misinformation. Their points are based onpossible. Having said that, we know that it takes
"exaggerations" on the damage done to wild life;literally centuries for plastic to degrade and this should
errors in how plastic bags are made (from ethanebe the foremost argument.
gas that would otherwise be burnt and notJust to expand a little on the paper bag argument,
petroleum); effects of co2 vs methane; potential jobwhich is totally reasonable, the option is not to cut
losses and so on.more trees. The options are to recycle and use
On the banning side of the argument, there can bebio-degradable alternatives.
exaggerations as well as questionable scientific data -In the old days, when plastic bags hadn't been
questionable as in anybody can question it, after all toinvented but grocery shops had, natural fiber bags
have an argument you must always have at leastwere used and the customers were the ones who
two points of view.brought their own to the shop.
From the "saving" the industry point of view, thereWith just a little effort on the individual front, these
can be many counter arguments to the data that iscampaigns wouldn't be necessary.