Why Nuclear Energy Cannot Be Considered a Good Alternative Energy Resource

There's a lot of talk these days about nuclear energy.man.
The subject has been discussed ad nauseam. SoAnd then there's the problem of what to do with all
what's the truth? Is nuclear energy the magic formulaof that radioactive waste that is created when
that will save the world, or is it the evil power thatnuclear power is generated. Nobody wants the stuff.
will destroy it?The old "not in my backyard" sentiment prevails. And
Nuclear power certainly has at least one verynobody should want it. It's dangerous and deadly.
appealing feature: it isn't fossil fuel. It doesn't have toRadiation accidents are one of the main concerns of
be pumped out of the ground. On the other hand,producing energy in nuclear reactors.
the source of nuclear energy is uranium, and uraniumThe words "Chernobyl disaster" come to mind. The
is not a renewable energy source. The largest knownnuclear reactor plant near Pripyat in the Ukrainian
deposits are in Australia. It's easily mined and easilySoviet Socialist Republic exploded on April 26, 1986
shipped to nuclear reactor sites around the world.-23 YEARS ago - and the place is still a wasteland.
The two processes in producing nuclear energy areWe're told that "only" 30 people died in the initial
fission and fusion. Fission creates more than 10 millionexplosion, but the number of deaths from cancer
times the energy that is created in the burning ofcaused by the release of the radiation is more likely
fossil fuels. That's the good part. Fusion, on the otherin the thousands.
hand (which is the process of joining nuclei), has notSo you can draw your own conclusions. There are
yet been safely controlled. Fusion happens naturally inboth advantages and disadvantages to nuclear
stars and the sun and in nuclear reactors built byenergy.